For commercial tenants, a lease is often the most significant long-term contractual commitment the business will enter into. Rent is only one part of the equation. Certain landlord rights, particularly rights that affect stability of tenure, can materially impact goodwill, financing, resale value, and long term planning. Three provisions in particular deserve careful scrutiny:
- the landlord’s right to early termination;
- the landlord’s right to relocate the tenant; and
- the landlord’s right to terminate for redevelopment.
The Landlord’s Right to Early Termination
First, tenants must pay close attention to any landlord right of early termination. Some leases permit the landlord to terminate before expiry of the term, sometimes broadly and at its discretion, and sometimes tied to events such as sale of the property or refinancing. This matters significantly if the tenant is investing in leasehold improvements, building location based goodwill, securing financing, or planning a future sale of the business. For retail, medical, restaurant, or franchise operations, stability of location is often central to enterprise value. Where possible, tenants should seek to remove early termination rights entirely. If the landlord insists on retaining the clause, it should be narrowly drafted and tied to clearly defined triggers rather than vague language allowing termination at any time on notice. Tenants should negotiate for meaningful notice, often 12 to 24 months, rather than short notice periods. Importantly, tenants should seek compensation protections, including repayment of unamortized leasehold improvement costs, reimbursement of relocation expenses, and in appropriate cases, business interruption compensation. Any early termination right should also be reviewed in light of lender requirements and franchise agreements to ensure it does not inadvertently trigger default.
The Landlord’s Right to Relocate the Tenant
Second, relocation clauses require careful consideration. These provisions permit the landlord to move the tenant to another unit within the building or complex. Although they may appear harmless, relocation can significantly affect visibility, foot traffic, layout functionality, signage, and customer access. For retail tenants in particular, location within the property can materially impact performance. Tenants should insist that any relocated premises be clearly defined as comparable or superior in size, visibility, frontage, and configuration, avoiding vague terms such as substantially similar. The landlord should bear all costs associated with relocation, including build out, design, moving expenses, IT and equipment reinstallation, and new signage. The lease should also require that the relocation be structured to avoid interruption of business, or provide compensation for downtime. Rent and additional rent should not increase as a result of relocation. In some circumstances, tenants may also seek a termination right if the relocated premises are not operationally viable for their business model.
The Landlord’s Right to Terminate for Redevelopment
Third, redevelopment termination clauses have become increasingly common, particularly in urban markets where land intensification is prevalent. These clauses permit the landlord to terminate the lease if the property is to be redeveloped. The practical effect is that a tenant who believes it has secured a ten-year term may in reality have no long-term security at all. This has direct implications for capital planning, long-term supply contracts, franchise approvals, and business valuation. Tenants should negotiate for a redevelopment blackout period during which the landlord cannot terminate, ideally covering the entire initial term or at minimum the first five to seven years. Extended notice, typically 18 to 24 months, should also be required. Compensation should at least include reimbursement of unamortized leasehold improvements and moving costs, and potentially brokerage expenses and other transition costs. In redevelopment scenarios, tenants may also seek a right of first refusal or priority opportunity to lease space in the new development on comparable economic terms. Renewal options should be drafted carefully to ensure redevelopment rights do not effectively nullify them without meaningful compensation.
The Bigger Picture: Stability Has Economic Value
Ultimately, stability has economic value. Landlords often describe these provisions as standard, but standard does not necessarily mean balanced. For many businesses, certainty of tenure may be more important than marginal rent savings. Before signing a lease, commercial tenants should assess the capital they are investing, their dependence on the location, their exit strategy, and the impact of a forced move on enterprise value. A commercial lease is not merely a rental agreement; it is a strategic business instrument. Careful negotiation at the outset can prevent costly disruption later.
If you are reviewing a proposed commercial lease, do not assume the terms are non-negotiable. Before you commit to a long-term lease, ensure the document works for your business, not just the landlord. We regularly negotiate commercial leases on behalf of tenants and would be pleased to assist—contact us to discuss your lease and protect your long‑term stability.
At Mills & Mills LLP, our lawyers regularly help clients with a wide range of legal matters including business law, real estate law, estate law, employment law, health law, and tax law. For over 140 years, we have earned a reputation amongst our peers and clients for quality of service and breadth of knowledge. Contact us online or at (416) 863-0125. The material provided through the Mills & Mills LLP website is for general information purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal advice or opinions of any kind.
2 St Clair Ave West
