When employees negotiate a separation from their employer, many may assume the deal is not final until they have signed the paperwork. A recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court suggests caution, and the consequences can be significant.
In Stribling v. Starbucks Coffee Canada Inc., 2026 ONSC 1030 [Stribling], the Court found that a Starbucks employee had entered into a binding and enforceable settlement agreement simply by sending an email, before any formal release was ever signed.
What Happened
After negotiations with Starbucks over his departure, Mr. Stribling emailed the company confirming he accepted the terms of a mutual separation and that he would sign the formal release once it arrived via DocuSign. The proposed terms covered his last day of work, compensation, benefits, and a confidentiality clause, addressing all the material elements of a separation package.
When the release arrived, however, Mr. Stribling refused to sign it. The document incorrectly stated that he was being dismissed for cause, which conflicted with what the parties had agreed upon. Although Starbucks acknowledged the error and promptly sent a corrected version, Stribling refused to sign that too and instead launched a wrongful dismissal claim.
The Ontario Superior Court dismissed his claim and ordered him to execute the release. The agreement, the Court held, had already been agreed to by his email.
The Elements of a Binding Contract Were Already Met
Courts treat an agreement as binding once the essential elements of a contract are present: a clear offer, acceptance, and consideration. Once there is a meeting of the minds on these three elements, there is a contract. The fact that parties contemplate signing a formal document later does not automatically mean that the deal remains open until the actual act of signing occurs.
The key question is whether the agreement left anything material still to be negotiated, or whether, in the Court’s words, there was “more to be discussed and agreed upon.” In Stribling, there was not. The offer set out all the essential terms. Mr. Stribling had the benefit of legal counsel. And his email expressing acceptance was a valid and unambiguous method of binding himself to those terms. The signed release was a formality to document a deal already struck; not a condition required for the deal to become binding.
A Clerical Error Is Not a Repudiation
Mr. Stribling also argued that Starbucks’ erroneous reference to termination “for cause” in the first release amounted to a repudiation of the agreement, which would have released him from any obligation to comply. The Court disagreed.
Repudiation requires a clear intention to no longer be bound by the contract. Here, the mistake was an administrative error, not a deliberate attempt to change the terms. The fact that Starbucks moved quickly to correct it and issue a replacement document only reinforced that they intended to honour the agreement as originally negotiated. There was no basis for treating the error as an attempt to renege.
Mr. Stribling’s remaining arguments also failed. The consideration was intact, as Starbucks’ promise of payment upon executing the release still stood. With Mr. Stribling having received legal advice, multiple deadline extensions, and no evidence of financial duress, there was no credible claim that his original acceptance had been made under illegitimate pressure.
Practical Takeaways
Stribling is a useful reminder for both employees and employers that written communications during settlement negotiations carry real legal weight. For employees, this means that accepting an offer in writing, even informally by email, can bind you to its terms before any formal document is signed. For employers, it confirms that a clearly drafted offer, once accepted, is binding even if one party later has second thoughts.
Before accepting or rejecting any separation offer, employees should ensure they fully understand the terms on the table and seek legal advice. Employers should similarly make sure their offers are carefully drafted and that all essential terms are addressed upfront, leaving as little as possible to be decided in a later release document.
If you are an employer looking to ensure your settlement offers are properly drafted and enforceable, or an employee who has received a separation package and wants to understand your rights before responding, our team can help. Contact our litigation and employment lawyers to book a consultation.
At Mills & Mills LLP, our lawyers regularly help clients with a wide range of legal matters including business law, real estate law, estate law, employment law, health law, and tax law. For over 140 years, we have earned a reputation amongst our peers and clients for quality of service and breadth of knowledge. Contact us online or at (416) 863-0125. The material provided through the Mills & Mills LLP website is for general information purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal advice or opinions of any kind.
2 St Clair Ave West
